We tried… and we tried… and we tried… and we finally succeeded!
After more than 3 years, the Diabetes Hands Foundation finally has a Wikipedia page.
Because it was such a painfully long process and because I couldn’t find too many complete articles when I googled “Wikipedia nonprofits“, I decided to share the lessons we learned so that you may not make the same mistakes we made.
Build your reputation and “notability” first
No matter how important you think your work is (and I am sure you are doing amazing things for others in the world), your organization needs to be notable, according to Wikipedia’s guidelines, before it can be Wikipedia-worthy. Quoting:
An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable.
Don’t kill the messenger! This set the rules of their site and it’s worked for them so far… though the jury is still out on this one. So, your blog? Not typically a reliable, independent secondary source. A passing mention in an article in your local newspaper? Not notable enough. Does it suck? Ask me! But if you come to think of it, it’s what keeps the site as encyclopedic as it can hope to be.
Make the page about your organization, not your programs
Our earlier attempts at getting a Wikipedia page up were focused on a page about TuDiabetes, the diabetes social network we run in English. As our first program, it got the most visibility at first and it got the most reliable (in our opinion) media coverage earlier. However, TuDiabetes, unlike Facebook or Google, is not a household name (not yet at least!) and it isn’t its own organization: it is a program of the Diabetes Hands Foundation.
The results when we posted a TuDiabetes page on Wikipedia in 2008 were disastrous. But I am going to let a screenshot of the page speak for itself:
Your Wikipedia page should encompass all your work. Not only will this be a more complete depiction of your work: it will also furnish you hopefully with more notable and reliable sources to insert as references in your page.
Let others write about you
This, to me, was one of the most puzzling things about getting a Wikipedia page started (for a nonprofit or any other organization). One of the arguments we heard from Wikipedia in our first attempt to write our own page was that others had to do write about us. It didn’t dawn on me that the this implied other MEDIA (reliable media, that is). It is not a problem for you to write your own page, but you have to make sure the reliable references are there and that you are writing about something bigger than a program you just launched.
Last few tips
- It helps to get a copy of a book like Wikipedia: The Missing Manual, but you don’t need it as much these days as you used to back in 2008 when it first came out. Recently, Wikipedia has added new features that make creating and editing articles a lot easier.
- Reputation management online is key, so make sure to watch your page. After you log in to Wikipedia, you will see a little star (it’s blank by default) next to the View History link for the page. Click on it (which will turn the star blue) to have your page added to your Watchlist.
- No matter how tempted you may feel to “trick” Wikipedia, don’t do it. Don’t waste your time or loose your account’s credibility in the process. Stick to the Wikipedia guidelines and address the concerns they may have about your page when you post it in a timeline fashion. Respect their decision even if you dislike it: this doesn’t mean you are not supposed to talk with them about your questions or ask for a more detailed explanation about a particular decision, but always do so in a respectful way.
- Most important of all: getting a Wikipedia page for your nonprofit is not a sprint. In the world of Web 2.0, this is as close to a marathon as it gets. Be patient and do your homework. It will pay off in the long run.
If you have any lessons you have learned from your experience with your Wikipedia page, I would love to hear them.
1st) adding an article or a piece of text on en.wikipedia.org is far easier than adding sth. on de.wikipedia.org . the wikipedia police is far stricter there.
2nd) you don’t loose your account’s credibility, if you don’t use an account. on wikipedia.org you can write and edit articles w/o logging in using an account. make use of it!
3rd) be trickier them them: add references to your program/organization/… within other articles, referring to a non-existant article. that puts some funny pressure on them.
4rd) if you don’t get at a pretty weird un-employed singular with far too much time, your article may not be targeted for months. use that time for improving it. and back it up to your hard disk!
I am not sure I would agree with some of the practices you describe, Jochen. I am glad if they have worked for you, but I think it’s best to work transparently out in the open: the alternative ultimately sets you up for risking your organization’s credibility, even if your personal account may not be compromised.
I’ve found that over the past couple of years, Wikipedia has become a lot more lenient on people working on the pages for companies that they worked for without automatically getting reverted. Previously, if you tried to add something to your organization’s page and you were sniffed out as an employee, your edits were automatically reverted whether or not they made sense and/or were right for the page.
I agree with Manny that notability is the key to success. If you’ve had an article published about your non-profit in the a major media source – national newspaper, magazine, high-profile blog, etc. – you’re going to be pretty safe in putting together a page on Wikipedia. But, don’t view it as a PR piece and try to get all flowerly. See it for what it is – an encyclopedia entry about your organization.
Hi Manny,
This is a great post! We would love to run it in our News service, which focuses on the Not for Profit sector in Australia – i think our audience would find it really useful. We often publish articles and advice on organisations using social media, however we haven’t covered Wikipedia.
Please let me know if this is ok,
Thanks,
Ryan